(2.) Whether
the
French assertion
that
to extend
The 5.5.
One
minimier
tariff
to
Goods
trans shikhed at
Canadian
H. Kory
loss of
to
wd.
meam
serd
France
France
& that
A
0.A.G.
says
Canadian Goods
at
H. Kong
is practically
the
(
time
it must excist
as
aft the same
out
arose
of
H. Kong quid pro quo
that trans shifimamit of
therefore give
Soods
are
Concerned
3
Drink
AAR
doesn't seem affected
(see 4987).123
that
muchh
as
far
as
wve
tell
3.0.
was
Correct
or not
referred this
out
that
as
for
thre
$.8
as
it
does not beeron
ob
much
are
Concenmad
and
as regards
H. Kong
write
at com
36909
lu
importance
ore Collins'
minute
whole of this trouble
by a form
who
wene
a complaint
shikking Canadian Goods
out
that
their
by vessels
belonging
to
to
Inama
via
Alfred
Holt
& Co.'s
94. Kong,
letter
see
5486/10
esh.
that
France is
enclored
therein
that
What
happens
is
that
tre
in
Jafran
that
The only result
Goodr
wh. enjoys
of the
trans shipped
minimum taribb
in Jahan ud
the goods are
minimum taribbe
wd be
transshipped
H. Kong
Surve
form of
reduced
therefore
that
the
농도
Concession
without
nout
be transshiffed at
H. Kory
and
there und
fe
mo
lors of
to
учатс
Мелетие
What
buy
wh.
Convention
from
H. Kong (wh means
at Ht Kong
0.A.G. apparently
wants is
goods and
Barkhede
trane stuffed there)
Inance the
requirement
the
Ous
Same
pounting
to trans shipment
not likely to lose
Cammot
therm
duties
a
Govt will
exchecting
Curo
3016
G
is impracticable,
meremice,
concession im
spirito
grant
a return
this
imported
benefit
of the
He
taribb
14514 110
andrad
but
they
France
only replied
for this
in
to
our
that
this
shd. affling
to
Perhaps
for
the
goods.
sho
stick to the narrower essive
into Frames
all
Ove
original request
Canadian
present
Page 420Page 421
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.